In the first place,
I am sure that a properly conducted, scientific survey of Adams Countians would show very little support for countywide zoning.
But in the second place, I sure wish somebody -- anybody -- whether it was the H-W writer, the JEO people, or somebody on the county board -- would have mentioned that a "survey" in which respondents can self-select their participation is entirely invalid, and that its "findings" have no connection to actual reality. This is particularly worth remembering when one or both sides in a controversy have made a concerted effort to get their supporters to phone in, log in, write in, or otherwise participate.
73.2, 11.4, 42.5, 18.7 -- they are all completely meaningless numbers. Completely. Meaningless. You might as well pick them out of a hat.
92.4, 8.6, 55.3, 30.9. There. Those numbers are just as valid.
But in the second place, I sure wish somebody -- anybody -- whether it was the H-W writer, the JEO people, or somebody on the county board -- would have mentioned that a "survey" in which respondents can self-select their participation is entirely invalid, and that its "findings" have no connection to actual reality. This is particularly worth remembering when one or both sides in a controversy have made a concerted effort to get their supporters to phone in, log in, write in, or otherwise participate.
73.2, 11.4, 42.5, 18.7 -- they are all completely meaningless numbers. Completely. Meaningless. You might as well pick them out of a hat.
92.4, 8.6, 55.3, 30.9. There. Those numbers are just as valid.