Of all the ignoramuses that the H-W lets onto its editorial page,
I have a hard time deciding whether Oliver North or Walter Williams is the worst. I gotta go with Williams because of his pretensions to intellectuality; North at least makes no bones about being a thickskull.
Today's Williams column features one source that is 12 years old, one that is 8 years old, and one new "source" from a right-wing foundation.
Worse yet, he's talking about a truly serious issue, one where I agree with him on most of his points. I just wish his work wasn't so lazy, sloppy, and politicized.
Today's Williams column features one source that is 12 years old, one that is 8 years old, and one new "source" from a right-wing foundation.
Worse yet, he's talking about a truly serious issue, one where I agree with him on most of his points. I just wish his work wasn't so lazy, sloppy, and politicized.
posted by Allthenewsthatfits at 10:24 AM
6 Comments:
Must be that liberal bias in the whig.
Of all the ignoramuses on that page , the main one is the Whig's editorial itself.
You couldn't come up with one ignoramus from the left? Tookie is correct, the Whig's op/ed staff are consistently the biggest one's on the page.
No one read it, but you...
I "neeeded" a good laugh
;)
Touche.
Post a Comment
<< Home