Monday, November 26, 2007

Interesting Dispute

.....between the IHSA and the Illinois Press Association over newspapers' increased use of photographs originally taken in a news context (and thus protected from invasion of privacy suits) for commercial purposes, such as reprints, coffee mugs, posters, etc. Newspapers, always searching for new revenue streams, may have drifted into the territory of commercial appropriation of individuals' images, which requires their consent.

On the other hand, who says the IHSA should control the use of a person's likeness, either? It's hard to feel much sympathy for either side.

2 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Both groups are acting like dolts.

Of course I've always felt the IHSA acts like petty Hitlers, goose-stepping up and down like Col. Klink saying "Ve control all uf dis, do not gainsay our power!"

While the IPA acts as if they are being personally insulted and their rights being trampled on whenever anyone dares suggest "You don't actually need access to everything, at all times, in all ways."

However there is a simple solution here:

For free access to photograph events, IPA must agree to not re-use images for profit except to make reproductions for family of the depicted athletes.

IHSA must them agree to create a "licensing bureau" with fees that grant various reproduction rights *in addition* to publication in the newspaper. They would handle all the necessary permissions from players, coaches, etc. The IPA would then have the right to reproduce for their own profit since they're paying a fee to support high school sports.

Easy. Smart. Everyone wins.

Which of course is why they'll never do anything like it because they're all a bunch of twits.

2:30 PM  
Blogger Allthenewsthatfits said...

Yeah, I'd say you've summed it up about right.

2:37 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home